Buy on Amazon
€67.61
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $621
Availability
MSRP in USD: $621
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 2575 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than Core i7-950 - 185 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-950 - $33.59 vs $60.91
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i7-950 3.06 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1366 Processor
Buy for €67.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 Hexa-core (6 Core) 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3
Buy for €37.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Single-Core
463
39.23728813559322%
Multi-Core
1569
28.631386861313867%
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.