Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 4305 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $73.12 vs $153.55
- Up to 28% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-11900F - $0.53 vs $0.74 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 49% better in Rust than Core i7-950 - 230 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 16 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18132 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
230
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
71%
Price, €
€170.44
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |