Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3985 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $73.12 vs $201.79
- Up to 63% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-10900 - $0.32 vs $0.86 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-950 - 261 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16591 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
261
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
37%
Price, €
€223.99
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €223.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16592 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |