Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-950 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-950 is 98 days older than the more expensive Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-860 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i7-860 - $60.91 vs $72.35
- Up to 17% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-860 - $0.4 vs $0.48 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €67.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
167
99.40476190476191%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
83.33333333333334%
Price, €
€80.31
84%
Buy for €80.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |