Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3410 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $73.12 vs $548.4
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-950 - 130 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 24 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77570 minutes ago
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77571 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Single-Core
463
36.342229199372056%
Multi-Core
1569
21.049101153742956%
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |