Buy on Amazon
€81.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $73.12 vs $134.54
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-950 - 407 vs 371 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-950 3.06 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1366 Processor
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76707 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler - YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for €149.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76709 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Single-Core
463
37.18875502008032%
Multi-Core
1569
25.666612138066412%
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.