Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $73.12 vs $135.27
- Up to 41% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 2600X - $0.48 vs $0.82 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-950 - 183 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
58%
Price, €
€150.15
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |