Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 200GE outperforms the more expensive Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 200GE is 3383 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-950 - 177 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i7-950 - $51.17 vs $73.12
- Up to 33% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-950 - $0.32 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13406 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €56.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13406 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |