Buy on Amazon
€170.44
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1096
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1096
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2860 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 10% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-940XM - 172 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 16 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler - YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14350 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-940XM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.