Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 2772 days newer than Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-940 - 118 vs 110 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
118
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |