Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 3067 days newer than Core i7-940.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Core i7-940 - 268 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940 - 12 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-940
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-940
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
447
41.853932584269664%
Multi-Core
1532
33.46439493228484%
Intel Core i7-940 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
