Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2972 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 40% better in F1 23 than Core i7-930 - 201 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-930 - $109.68 vs $145.32
- Up to 46% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-930 - $0.61 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-930 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-930 - 12 vs 8 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €161.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Feb 28th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |