Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G645 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G645 is 1385 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Performs up to 0% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i7-920 - 204 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-920 - $29.97 vs $65.81
- Up to 56% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i7-920 - $0.16 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
203
99.50980392156863%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
44.44444444444445%
Price, €
€73.05
45%
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €33.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Pentium G645 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Pentium |
Bloomfield | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |