Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 4270 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $65.81 vs $204.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10850K - $0.62 vs $1.65 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 17% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-920 - 137 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
117
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.65/FPS
37%
Price, €
€226.44
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |