Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 5530 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $68.73 vs $168.17
- Up to 51% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-14400 - $0.69 vs $1.4 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 21% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-920 - 133 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
110
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€76.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €76.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Buy for €186.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |