Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 5062 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $68.73 vs $171.82
- Up to 55% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-13600KF - $0.33 vs $0.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-920 - 260 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 20 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
229
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€76.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €76.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
260
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
45%
Price, €
€190.72
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €190.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |