Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 4796 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $65.81 vs $658.06
- Up to 89% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-12400F - $0.34 vs $3.08 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Fortnite than Core i7-920 - 237 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 12 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
212
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.08/FPS
11%
Price, €
€730.45
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |