Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 4502 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $65.81 vs $102.37
- Up to 15% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-11600 - $0.11 vs $0.13 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 27% better in Valorant than Core i7-920 - 863 vs 680 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 12 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
680
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6997 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
863
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
84%
Price, €
€113.63
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6998 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |