Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 4502 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $65.81 vs $84.81
- Up to 13% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11400F - $0.58 vs $0.67 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 10% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-920 - 140 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 12 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
127
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9914 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
86%
Price, €
€94.14
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9914 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |