Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 4182 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $65.81 vs $95.05
- Up to 20% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i5-10600K - $0.81 vs $1.01 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-920 - 104 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
104
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
80%
Price, €
€105.51
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for €105.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |