Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 4182 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $65.81 vs $87.75
- Up to 20% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-10320 - $0.49 vs $0.61 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-920 - 160 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
148
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |