Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 3440 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $65.81 vs $135.27
- Up to 51% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Ryzen 5 2600X - $0.39 vs $0.79 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-920 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
189
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
49%
Price, €
€150.15
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |