Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the more expensive Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3884 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 41% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-920 - 99 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i7-920 - $56.59 vs $65.81
- Up to 39% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-920 - $0.63 vs $1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€62.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €62.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |