Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8300 is 1436 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 11% cheaper than FX-8300 - $68.73 vs $77.55
- Up to 13% better value when playing F1 22 than FX-8300 - $0.27 vs $0.31 per FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Core i7-920 - 252 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 95 vs 130 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
251
99.60317460317461%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€76.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €76.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
252
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
87.0967741935484%
Price, €
€86.08
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for €86.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Bloomfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |