Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4888 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $81.89 vs $320.62
- Up to 70% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-14900K - $0.63 vs $2.11 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 17% better in Dead Space than Core i7-880 - 169 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
145
85.79881656804734%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €90.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2303 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.11/FPS
29.857819905213272%
Price, €
€355.89
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €355.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2316 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
16.768784263140923%
Multi-Core
1653
7.871428571428571%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |