Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3943 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $81.89 vs $175.48
- Up to 48% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-11900F - $0.4 vs $0.77 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-880 - 252 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
230
91.26984126984127%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €90.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4901 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
252
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
51.948051948051955%
Price, €
€194.78
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €194.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4910 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
23.952095808383234%
Multi-Core
1653
18.024206738632646%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |