Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 2193 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $81.89 vs $91.4
- Up to 7% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-6900K - $0.63 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i7-880 - 150 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
145
96.66666666666667%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €90.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4890 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
92.6470588235294%
Price, €
€101.45
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4894 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
41.533546325878596%
Multi-Core
1653
23.22281539758359%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |