Key Differences
In short — Core i7-880 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-880 is 827 days older than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 23 than Core i3-3220T - 153 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-880 - $43.43 vs $81.89
- Up to 44% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-880 - $0.33 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
55.93220338983051%
Price, €
€90.9
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €90.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4856 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
148
96.73202614379085%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4857 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
88.07692307692308%
Multi-Core
941
56.92679975801573%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220T |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |