Key Differences
In short — Core i7-880 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-880 is 2865 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-880 - $39.15 vs $81.89
- Up to 53% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-880 - $0.37 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
47.43589743589743%
Price, €
€90.9
47%
Buy for €90.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3695 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3702 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |