Key Differences
In short — Core i7-880 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-880 is 1281 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-880 - $28.95 vs $81.89
- Up to 65% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-880 - $0.22 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
34.92063492063492%
Price, €
€90.9
35%
Buy for €90.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2051 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2054 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |