Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3048 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $81.89 vs $291.66
- Up to 70% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.82 vs $2.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-880 - 120 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 24 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
111
92.5%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €90.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2300 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.7/FPS
30.370370370370363%
Price, €
€323.74
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €323.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2307 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
40.816326530612244%
Multi-Core
1653
22.17601287899115%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Lynnfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |