Buy on Amazon
€90.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2629 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $81.89 vs $456.96
- Up to 81% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.28 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-880 - 344 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 32 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
320
93.02325581395348%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.9
100%
Value Winner
CPU Processor Intel Core i7-880 i7 880 3.067 GHz Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for €90.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5085 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
344
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
19.04761904761905%
Price, €
€507.23
17%
FPS Winner
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for €507.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5091 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.