Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 3325 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - $81.89 vs $91.24
- Up to 5% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 3400G - $0.82 vs $0.86 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-880 - 118 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
111
94.0677966101695%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €90.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1572 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
118
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
95.34883720930232%
Price, €
€101.28
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
46.09929078014184%
Multi-Core
1653
45.675600994749935%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |