Key Differences
In short — Core i7-880 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-880 is 877 days older than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Performs up to 6% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than FX-8320 - 51 vs 48 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i7-880 - $69.47 vs $81.89
- Up to 10% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i7-880 - $1.61 vs $1.78 per FPS
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
51
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.78/FPS
90.4494382022472%
Price, €
€90.9
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for €90.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1589 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
48
94.11764705882352%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1591 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Lynnfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |