Key Differences
In short — Core i7-880 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-880 is 820 days older than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Performs up to 3% better in Dirt 5 than FX-4130 - 142 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-880 - $38.04 vs $81.89
- Up to 52% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-880 - $0.31 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
48.4375%
Price, €
€90.9
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €90.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2050 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
FPS
138
97.1830985915493%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2051 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Lynnfield | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |