Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 3250 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $131.61 vs $247.87
- Up to 30% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-9900 - $0.94 vs $1.35 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 31% better in Rust than Core i7-875K - 204 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
156
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17924 minutes ago
Buy for €275.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17925 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |