Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 3623 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $131.61 vs $186.45
- Up to 24% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.64 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-875K - 247 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 20 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
230
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
247
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
76%
Price, €
€206.96
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €206.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |