Buy on Amazon
€146.09
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $312
Availability
MSRP in USD: $312
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-4770 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-4770 is 1099 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Performs up to 23% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i7-875K - 114 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $54.8 vs $131.61
- Up to 66% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i7-875K - $0.53 vs $1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-875K Processor 2.93 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Core i7-4770
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
114
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-4770 Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.4 GHZ LGA 1150 8 MB Cache BX80646I74770
Buy for €60.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Core i7-4770
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i7-4770 |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.