Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3623 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $131.61 vs $165.23
- Up to 6% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-10700F - $1.48 vs $1.58 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-875K - 116 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 16 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
99
85%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14103 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.58/FPS
93%
Price, €
€183.41
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for €183.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |