Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 3623 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-875K - 136 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $89.94 vs $131.61
- Up to 42% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-875K - $0.73 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 12 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €99.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |