Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100 is 3016 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Core i7-875K - 200 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $100.17 vs $131.61
- Up to 27% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-875K - $0.56 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€111.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €111.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |