Key Differences
In short — Core i7-875K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-875K is 143 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-540 - 155 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $43.86 vs $127.23
- Up to 65% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-875K - $0.32 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
155
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
35.16483516483516%
Price, €
€141.23
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €141.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
154
99.35483870967742%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 73 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |