Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4237 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than Core i7-875K - 279 vs 253 FPS
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $29.24 vs $131.61
- Up to 79% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-875K - $0.12 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
279
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |