Buy on Amazon
€141.23
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3691 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $127.23 vs $215.7
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 39% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-875K - 197 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 24 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core i7-875K Processor 2.93 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for €141.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-core, 24-Threads Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for €239.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
509
29.43898207056102%
Multi-Core
1761
17.55732801595214%
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.