Key Differences
In short — Core i7-875K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-875K is 877 days older than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $47.02 vs $131.61
- Up to 64% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i7-875K - $0.27 vs $0.75 per FPS
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Buy for €52.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Lynnfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |