Buy on Amazon
€141.23
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3461 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 7% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-875K - 132 vs 123 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $72.23 vs $127.23
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-875K Processor 2.93 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for €141.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
AMD Athlon 3000G 2-Core, 4-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for €80.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
509
53.18704284221526%
Multi-Core
1761
89.16455696202532%
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.