Buy on Amazon
€161.51
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 204 days older than the cheaper Core i7-8700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $145.5 vs $238.37
- Up to 38% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i9-7920X - $0.64 vs $1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 0% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-8700T - 255 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700T - 24 vs 12 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
254
99.6078431372549%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.51
100%
Value Winner
Intel CM8068403358413 Core i7-8700T Prcsr Tray
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1608 minutes ago
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
61.53846153846154%
Price, €
€264.59
61%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-7920X X-Series Processor 12 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 140W
Buy for €264.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1608 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700T | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.