Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-8700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 759 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-8700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-8700T - 125 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $186.45 vs $218.59
- Up to 18% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-8700T - $1.66 vs $2.02 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700T - 20 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €242.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€206.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €206.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |