Buy on Amazon
€161.51
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 944 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 15% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G3900 - 126 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $29.18 vs $145.5
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel CM8068403358413 Core i7-8700T Prcsr Tray
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76395 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76393 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
43.948562783661124%
Multi-Core
992
21.14687699850778%
Intel Core i7-8700T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.