Buy on Amazon
€161.51
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1946 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 54% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1620 - 353 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $35.83 vs $145.5
- Up to 63% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-8700T - $0.17 vs $0.46 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
353
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
36.95652173913044%
Price, €
€161.51
24%
FPS Winner
Intel CM8068403358413 Core i7-8700T Prcsr Tray
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3204 minutes ago
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
229
64.87252124645893%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
30.93797276853253%
Multi-Core
723
15.412492005968875%
Intel Core i7-8700T | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.